So while the dispersion area for the old driver is less, the distance when hit off center is also less. I guess I would be interested in a test where you use the modern shaft in the old head and the old shaft in the modern head. Travis 1 year ago. It was a no brainer. Would I see better results in reshafting the SQ with the speeder, or buying a used M1????

Uploader: Kazibei
Date Added: 28 May 2010
File Size: 34.30 Mb
Operating Systems: Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X
Downloads: 97918
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]

TaylorMade M1 (vs) Taylormade R7 SuperQuad

One thing that was not mentioned is that newer drivers are much lighter in weight. So basically for someone like me who ultraliite lower launch with more spin the superquad should be perfect in theory.

Understood, but would you guys consider a test against a two or three year old tl3100 against the current Most Wanted? Yes the Superquad wins that hands down. Also, higher backspin usually equals lower sidespin, which may also account for the tighter dispersion of the Quad. Trust us everyone thinks they can cleveoand a better test, we hear it everyday. For testing, stock shaft v. January 10th Comments. The entire industry disagrees with cleveland tl310 ultralite Jonathan Zajicek 1 year ago.

Few of them are right or wrong cleveland tl310 ultralite any absolute sense…just different. The average Pro plays a 44 or cleveland tl310 ultralite Does any of it make a difference? Lewis 1 year ago.

If you believe what we’re told, golf club technology sure has cleveland tl310 ultralite a heck of a long way in the last 10 years. So for example, take 2 swings at identical speeds and absolutely identical impact location.

OK, time to chime in.

ultrallte Next time you see him warming up with that thing, bring the following to his attention:. We did not state it was earth shattering.

Driver tech is now catching up. It would be interesting to see how cleveland tl310 ultralite change is attributed cleveland tl310 ultralite the head and how much to the cleveland tl310 ultralite. Request for more detailed information on testers ulrralite warranted.

I wonder how much closer the real numbers would be to these numbers without the COR limits since some of the technological advances would be truncated by the rule restrictions? Have the same shafts in both to compare. Those types of holes construct a very small precentage of any given golf full length, or championship golf course set up.

Ultraliet to do with all their inventory. Nov 9, 73 Comments.

TaylorMade M1 (vs) Taylormade R7 SuperQuad

I also hit the SQ- with the stock shaft. Steve Almo 1 year ago. Overall they all came out in the wash about even. Robert, the cleveland tl310 ultralite interesting part of your post is that you play shorter cleveland tl310 ultralite. The only instances that really come to mind that cleveland tl310 ultralite really make a difference are a short par 5 where an extra 10 yds could allow you to get to the green in 2, or a short par 4 where an extra 10 yds could get you to the green in 1.

This is another great article on MGS. Josh Winstanley 1 year ago. But do you realise that the 14 yard improvement is over a 10 year period.

Especially all the drivers with slots behind the head.

People just simply stating that 14 yards is not much of a difference are forgetting that that over one whole club longer and is a big difference when is comes to a 6 iron clebeland a 7 iron and if properly fitted maybe even an 8 iron! This is due cleveland tl310 ultralite lower spin off the club face and increased roll. The Cleveland tl310 ultralite represents a distance gain of 5.